08.27.07
AutoTech Review - Part 1

This was the first time I had visited AutoTech so I didn’t really know what to expect, but as it turned out, the format and presentation subjects were very similar to the Odette conference that I attended in Munich last year. AIAG claimed that there were around 1000 registered for the event but in a large venue such as the Rock Financial Showplace in Novi, Detroit, it felt as though there were less attendees than this.

The event was split into two main areas, an exhibition hall where the software and services vendors could showcase their solutions and a number of presentation rooms where attendees could listen to the latest trends in Automotive related IT and supply chain management initiatives. GXS did not have a booth at the event, we decided, from a networking point of view, that we would sponsor the first night cocktail party and also the internet booth. The internet booth was actually quite a large space, more like an executive lounge with about 20 PCs, wireless connectivity, leather sofas and coffee served throughout the day. We were able to hold a number of informal discussions with both existing and new customers.
The cocktail party was arranged to celebrate the 25th Anniversary of AIAG, and it was fitting that one of the oldest companies in the B2B and EDI space should sponsor this particular event. Only two of our main competitors were present at the event, one of them had a fairly large stand which included a NASCAR simulator, and the other had a relatively small stand in the middle of the hall.
Each of the automotive manufacturers had a booth in the exhibition hall and most of them decided to exhibit a car. The GM stand had the most impressive car on display, a concept car shown for the first time at the Detroit Motor Show this year, the Chevrolet Volt. This was an interesting take on the many hybrid engine cars on the market today. It was driven primarily by electric motors around town but on slightly longer runs, or when the batteries get low, a small, low emission 1.0 Litre petrol engine was used to charge the batteries whilst it was moving. Compared to other hybrid cars this one was only driven by the electric motors, the petrol engine was not connected to the wheels at all and was only used for charging purposes. Every automotive manufacturer has some form of hybrid car under development, but this one was certainly the most impressive from a technical stand point, and it looked good externally as well, see the picture below. Further information about this concept car can be found by clicking here GM-VOLT Website
Another interesting exhibit was from Microsoft who showed their Ford Sync car concept. This was a great example of how Microsoft wish to see their products integrated or embedded with car entertainment systems. In short, the Microsoft system within this car was a fully integrated, voice activated in-car communication and entertainment system for your mobile phone and digital music player. As a demonstration of the theme of AutoTech, co-opetition, the Sync system offers support for both the Apple iPod and Microsoft’s own Zune music player. A good example of a company listening to what the customer wants rather than forcing only one option, ie the Zune integration upon the Sync’s potential customers. Further information about the Sync concept can be found HERE
During Autotech, six OEMs, GM, Ford, Chrysler,Toyota, Honda and Volvo gave a presentation on the work they are currently doing to improve their supply chain management processes. This blog will describe what GM, Ford and Chrysler had to say, the others will be covered in another blog entry. GM talked about the car industry as a whole. They highlighted a number of misconceptions about the automotive industry, none of which were true, namely that it was a stagnant / non growth sector, it was unprofitable, receding in importance to customers and the 20th century technology used in the cars was old fashioned. In fact, did you know that the global market for the automotive industry was $1.2 Trillion and growing, the U.S market alone was estimated to be about $500Billion, the market was increasingly consumer driven and technology such as GM’s Volt and Microsoft’s Sync concept were leading technological change. They also highlighted that China was one of the leading manufacturers, with 50% of all worldwide cameras manufactured there, as were, 25% of toys, 60% of bicycles and now 9% of cars. GM also highlighted that they were now a true global manufacturer with a manufacturing presence in nearly every region of the world. They presented some incredible statistics from their daily, global logistics operation. Every day they use 8600 trucks, 750 rail cars and 1400 shipping containers for the delivery 160,000 car components to their 81 assembly plants, 97 manufacturing plants around the world. In addition they also distribute 21000 vehicles, 14000 via rail and 4000 via sea, every day as well. These figures are astounding and when you think the other U.S based OEMs have similar operations, you can understand why supply chain and logistics management is such an important area for them.
Chrysler gave a very upbeat presentation after their recent acquisition by Cerberus. They presented a very positive outlook which was going to be driven by what they call their Recovery and Transformation Plan (RTP). The recovery part of their plan would sharply focus on cost, revenue management, material and fixed costs, capacity and efficiency and finally employee retention. The transformation part of the plan will improve focus on customers and brands, increase global presence and increase the number of partnerships. They mapped out a 3 year plan for how they would return to profitability, which included bringing 20 new vehicles to market and spending nearly $3Billion on new powertrain systems. They were also keen to explore global growth strategies including forming a new joint venture partnership with the Chery car company in China. Chrysler also talked about their supplier management program and how they use a process called Value Stream Mapping to improve efficiencies and reduce waste in their manufacturing process.
Ford decided to talk about their Global Product Development System, GPDS, this system was developed from two AIAG standards, namely PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) and APQP (Advanced Product Quality Planning). The resulting GPDS includes 31 elements covering everything from quality processes, change management processes and revision control. The intention is that Ford will adopt their GPDS across all their brands and across all car platforms by 2009. The intention is to have a global car development process and all suppliers that wish to work with any Ford related brand must be able to use and comply with this process. In addition the GPDS also includes a single, common reporting tool for suppliers, and a standardized management reporting tool for Ford execs. The GPDS will help Ford to improve the quality of design and engineering related information that is sent to them by their suppliers.
Overall the presentations were very positive and on the last day of the event all of the purchasing directors, from each OEM present, attended a joint panel to discuss future purchasing strategies. They all agreed that moving forwards, one of the only ways to help reduce costs still further was for the OEMs to try and work together and try and share sourcing programs between them. This would ultimately mean that the OEMs could eventually end up sharing parts sourcing strategies between them. The aim of this would be to help share production and logistics costs. Many OEMs are already working together on joint engine development programs already but significant cost reductions can be realized still further by sharing component sourcing costs. This strategy comes back to the theme of the event, Co-opetition, working together and creating supply chain value. So here is a question for you, if the OEMs are willing to work together on joint strategies such as this, how long will it be before we see software and service vendors working together more openly on joint projects?



