09.25.07
B2B Data Management and the Potato, Potahto Debate
One of our other bloggers, Bryan Larkin, recently began using the phrase “B2B Data Management.” I can’t say for sure if he coined it, but he’s the first person I ever heard say it. And I absolutely LOVE it! Because the truth is, data synchronization alone will not bring about world peace – though I expressed my hopes for this in a past blog. True nirvana will only be achieved when a business takes all of the components into account – foundational data quality, continuous data synchronization, both internally and externally, transaction integrity for all downstream supply chain business interactions (more on this in a future blog – unless Bryan gets to it first), and 100% rollout to all trading partners. Approaching any implementation initiative with all of these things in mind is having a true B2B data management strategy. So, would you rather say, “let’s talk about improving B2B data management,” or “let’s talk about improving dataqualitydatasynchronizationtransactionintegrityandpartnerrolloutmanagement?” And because I love clichés so much, I guess I should also point out that you don’t want to try and boil the ocean by solving all of these problems at once, but you definitely need to look at your requirements holistically. Then, when you put the little “data quality” pot of water on the stove and see it start to bubble relatively quickly, you can take satisfaction in the accomplishment and move on to tackle the other gallons, liters, reservoirs, and seas of work ahead of you.
I have had the opportunity to discuss B2B data management with several customers in the past week. Their needs are varied and vast, and this warms my heart as it will keep me busy thinking up new products and features for many months to come. But I confess that I had a moment of panic in one of the meetings. One client commented that they don’t think that integration is broken; they think the main problem lies in backend systems – or the lack thereof, particularly for many small-to-medium sized businesses.
Honestly, this caught me by surprise. I mean, I work for a company that is in the B2B integration space, so if integration isn’t broken, how do I have any chance of coming up with new ways to help drive GXS into the future?
Another GXS blogger helped bring me back to reality. It’s not necessarily that integration is broken, but that many companies still have a long way to go. Thank you John, for reminding me that we still have great work to do. And our customer was definitely also correct – backend systems are pretty much a mess. I could probably write a novel on that topic, but let’s save that for another day and a different blog!
On a side note, I also wanted to point out that I really enjoyed John’s post on Cub Scouts and Continuous Visibility for two reasons: 1) it’s heartwarming to see that there are still people out there investing in our kids and teaching them survival, readiness, and social skills, and 2) he pointed out how any error early on in the process can lead to multiple challenges downstream. A simple compass exercise shows that one mistake begins to accumulate as further points are plotted erroneously. Luckily, in the case of the Cub Scouts, they have John to keep them on course. And, fortunately for businesses, a sound B2B data management strategy can keep you on track for reduced costs, greater profits, increased productivity, and the whole ball of wax, too!
